by leovolf » Tue May 13, 2014 3:19 pm
I am bad at Twitter and at this point I have very little interest in being good at Twitter. I do however have an interest in becoming a better writer and performer. I get it. We live in an era where Twitter=Comedy and there is absolutely a conversation to be had about social media and any sort of serious aspirations in comedy. I just don’t think that conversation should happen while trying to register for a class at the country’s only accredited improv and sketch comedy school.
UCB and the improv community aren't exactly celebrated for having a diverse student body. By running your registrar through a social network (and I’m sure it’s not intentional) you’re really taking a stand and just adding another subset to an already pretty narrow demographic. It just seems like a very bold statement about the type of student you’re trying to attract. “You’re not active on twitter? Well, maybe UCB is not for you.” If that is the case, make that very clear in all class descriptions, so someone like myself can pursue my studies at a theater where my progress isn’t hindered by my habitual use of Twitter.
I really do appreciate the effort to try to improve the system and alleviate the stress of classes selling out quickly. I just think the reasoning behind this switch is flawed. The idea of rewarding students who check the website frequently sounds nice in theory. Is this what is really happening here though? Are you tracking who is registering directly through the site as opposed to the link on twitter? I would be very surprised to find out that anyone is able to register for any class directly through the site without getting some sort of notification ahead of time. Especially, if you're competing with someone who is submerged in the Twittersphere.
I agree that a message board and forum aren’t exactly on the cutting edge of technology and the need to stay up to date is essential. Except we are talking about functionality and being dependent on a social network to run your registrar just seems absurd. Speaking of social networks. Why Twitter? I obviously have my own skeptical views on the matter, but after taking five minutes to Google some things, it just doesn’t make sense. According to Pew Research Center’s Internet Project Tracking Surveys, only 18% of internet users use Twitter. Pinterest is now more popular than Twitter! Also, only 46% of Twitter users log into their accounts every day. While these are just numbers and statistics, when you’re talking about classes selling out within 90 seconds, these sort of numbers should at least be in the conversation.
I can go on and on about Twitter, but I think the bigger issue is figuring out how to efficiently and fairly fill the constantly growing demand for classes. I have no doubt this is a constant concern with the decision makers at UCB. Maybe I have a unique situation (completed Sketch 201 and currently finishing up Improv 101), but with this current system I have absolutely zero chance of continuing in either program. (I feel like it’s a given, but just in case, I get the twitter notifications on my phone and I also get the IFTTT alerts. When a sketch 301 sells out within seconds, getting an IFTTT alert within 15 minutes seems a little comical.) Until the demand for classes can be adequately filled, having a lottery, a waiting list, posting the registration times ahead of time on Twitter, or really anything else, all seem like much more practical and fair solutions. While the issue before was people not getting into a class because they lost some sort of race. This past month, someone like me was never even at the starting line.
Last edited by
leovolf on Wed May 14, 2014 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.